79
may be so badly laid out, the permanent way so light, and the bridges so inadequate in strength that the Hongkong section trains could not safely run over them and it is even conceivable that the gauge might be altered". It would seem to me that in this matter the Secretary of State has lost sight of the fact that the loan agreement stipulates that "the line shall be built and equipped in accordance with the best modern system" (Article 2) and the Engineer-in-Chief is responsible for its "efficient construction" (Article 6).
Emphasis is laid on the fact that as the railway itself forms the 1st mortgage security of the British and Chinese Corporation it is essential to their interests that it should be thoroughly efficient. That they will safeguard those interests is the guarantee to this Government. As regards a change of gauge, I should maintain that such an act would be a violation of Article 18 which pledges the Chinese to the Joint Working of the two lines as two sections of the same line. It will moreover be essential to their interests that their line should have access to the sea. In the matter of efficient and economical construction, I have every confidence in the Chief Resident Engineer, Mr. Grove. Hitherto at any rate he has received support from his colleague, Mr. Wei Hun, and I have no reason to think that the Chinese Authorities are inclined to interfere with his technical work, or to bring pressure to bear upon him to make it of a less efficient character.
8. There is, however, a danger which appears to me to be of a more tangible and real character. The Chinese Government are offering what appear to be exorbitant prices for the land required. In this connection I enclose a memorandum regarding the rates offered in the British and Chinese sections respectively. Since it is alleged that the peasants refuse even these offers it is conceivable that they may be increased or purchase indefinitely postponed and since
:
79
may be so badly laid out, the permanent way so light, and the
bridges so inadequate in strength that the Hongkong seetion
trains could not safely run over them and it is even
conceivable that the gauge might be altered". It would seem to
me that in this matter the Secretary of State has lost sight
of the fact that the loan agreement stipulates that "the line
shall be built and equipped in accordance with the best
modern system" (Article 2) and the Engineer-in-Chief is
responsible for its "efficient construction" (Artédle 6).
Pmphasis is laid on the fact that as the railway itself forms
the 1st mortgage security of the British and Chinese Corporation
it is essential to their interests that it should be thoroughly
efficient. That they will safeguard those interests is the
guarantee to this Government. As regards a change of gauge,
I should maintain that s ch an act would be a violation of
Article 18 which pledges the Chinese to the Joint Working
of the two lines as two sections of the same line. It will
moreover be essential to their interests that their line
should have access to the sea. In the matter of efficient and
economical construction, I have every confidence in the Chief
Resident Engineer, Mr.Grove. Witherto at any rate he has
received support from his colleague, Mr.Wei Hun, and I have
no reason to think that the Chinese Authorities are inclined
to interfere with his technical work, or to bring pressure
to bear upon him to make it of a less efficient character.
8. There is, however, a danger which appears to me
to be of a more tangible and real character. The Chinese
Government are offering what appear to be exorbitant prices
for the land required. In this connection I enclose a
memorandum regarding the rates offered in the British and Chinese sections respectively. Since it is alleged that the peasants refuse even these offers it is conceivable that they may be increased or purchase indefinately postponed and since
all
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.